The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Sophia Zackrisson, MD, PhD. Photo.

Sophia Zackrisson

Manager

Sophia Zackrisson, MD, PhD. Photo.

A pilot study of an organised population‐based testing programme for prostate cancer

Author

  • Max Alterbeck
  • Erik Thimansson
  • Johan Bengtsson
  • Erik Baubeta
  • Sophia Zackrisson
  • Anetta Bolejko
  • Kevin Sandeman
  • Sigrid Carlsson
  • Thomas Jiborn
  • Anders Bjartell

Summary, in English

Objective
To determine the feasibility of a digitally automated population-based programme for organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) in Southern Sweden.

Patients and Methods
A pilot project for a regional OPT was conducted between September 2020 and February 2021, inviting 999 randomly selected men aged 50, 56, or 62 years (y). Risk stratification was based on PSA, PSA density (PSAD), and biparametric prostate MRI. Men with a PSA level of 3–99 ng/mL had an MRI, and men with elevated PSA (≥ 3 ng/mL) had a urological check-up, including a DRE and TRUS. Indications for targeted and/or systematic transrectal prostate biopsies were suspicious lesions on MRI (prostate imaging reporting and data system [PI-RADS] 4–5) and/or PSAD > 0.15 ng/mL/cm3. Additional indications for prostate biopsies were palpable tumours, PSA ratio
Results
A total of 418 men had a PSA test (42%), with increasing participation rates by age (50y, 38%; 56y, 44%; and 62y, 45%). Among these, 35 men (8%) had elevated PSA (≥ 3 ng/mL: 50y, 1/139; 56y, 10/143; and 62y, 24/146). On MRI, 16 men (48%) had a negative scan (PI-RADS 0.15 ng/mL/cm3 or a suspicious finding on TRUS. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in ten men. Six men underwent active treatment, whereas four men were assigned to active surveillance.

Conclusion
Our OPT model is feasible from an operational point of view, but due to the limited scale of this study no conclusions can be made regarding the efficacy of the diagnostic model or outcome

Department/s

  • Urological cancer, Malmö
  • Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö
  • Diagnostic Radiology, (Lund)
  • LU Profile Area: Light and Materials
  • LTH Profile Area: Photon Science and Technology
  • EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
  • eSSENCE: The e-Science Collaboration

Publishing year

2024

Language

English

Pages

87-95

Publication/Series

BJU International

Volume

133

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Urology and Nephrology
  • Cancer and Oncology

Status

Published

Research group

  • Urological cancer, Malmö
  • Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1464-4096